We use cookies to to enhance the service we deliver you. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
News Regulation Networks

Ofgem 'passing the buck' on economic impact of TCR

Image: Ofgem

Image: Ofgem

Ofgem has been accused of “passing the buck” over the financial repercussions of its Targeted Charging Review (TCR).

The TCR - and its potential impact on the deployment of renewables - has been a contentious issue since Ofgem revealed details of the reforms last November.

Speaking as part of a panel discussing the TCR at Solar and Storage Live last week, Madeleine Greenhalgh, policy lead at Regen, said the shortfall of the system cost as a result of the charges being levied in the way Ofgem is suggesting could reach £4 billion.

“It’s a massive cost that’s going to need to be made up and Ofgem are saying that the cost will need to be made up by BEIS through the Contracts for Difference," Greenhalgh said, continuing to say there is “a little bit of passing the buck” over who is responsible.

“The problem there is that we know BEIS isn’t going to sort that out. They’ve been very clear- no new subsidies before 2025."

A report on the TCR published by Aurora Energy Research in May found that 6GW of subsidy-free renewables could be wiped off pipelines and a separate study found that elements of the reforms stood to adversely impact on the economic viability of onshore renewables.

Also speaking on the panel, Sam Street, manager of energy practice at Frontier Economics, said the consultancy's latest analysis was modeled against a similar scenario to Aurora’s report, having been asked by Ofgem to test the benefits case to an assumption of lower renewables, where deployment of some subsidy-free projects over the next twenty years is delayed.

In this scenario, the government’s “only option” is to pursue “an inefficient policy to choose the more expensive technology, which is offshore wind” if it wants to maintain decarbonisation goals, Street said.

However, Street was quick to specify that Frontier wasn’t “making any forecast on the impact on solar and wind”.

The timing of the reforms is “unhelpful” for investors due to the loss of the feed-in tariff and the “challenges” of trying to finance subsidy-0free projects, said Stirling Habbitts, sector lead of project finance London at Triodos Bank.

The TCR means “potentially lower revenues and that does mean that the funders take a slightly higher risk because of those reviews going forward,” Habbitts said.

Loading...

End of content

No more pages to load